引用本文
  • 蒋臻欢,沈磊,王强,等.微创双通道技术治疗老年ⅠA型难复性股骨转子间骨折[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2022,43(6):828-833.    [点击复制]
  • JIANG Zhenhuan,SHEN Lei,WANG Qiang,et al.Dual-channel minimally invasive surgery for treatment of irreducible ⅠA intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients[J].Journal of Tongji University(Medical Science),2022,43(6):828-833.   [点击复制]
【打印本页】 【在线阅读全文】【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 263次   下载 282 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
微创双通道技术治疗老年ⅠA型难复性股骨转子间骨折
蒋臻欢,沈磊,王强,蒋建中,陈俊,张盘军
0
(江苏省宜兴市人民医院骨科,江苏 宜兴214200;江苏省宜兴市人民医院老年医学科,江苏 宜兴214200)
摘要:
目的探讨微创双通道技术治疗老年ⅠA型难复性股骨转子间骨折疗效。方法回顾性分析2016年8月—2020年6月于江苏省宜兴市人民医院行微创双通道治疗老年ⅠA型难复性股骨转子间骨折患者52例,与同时期采用三通道治疗此类骨折患者82例进行对照,对比两组患者骨折复位时间、手术时间、术中出血量、术后髋部疼痛评分、术后超敏C反应蛋白水平、骨折复位质量、骨折愈合时间及相关并发症等。结果两组患者术前一般资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与三通道组患者相比,双通道组患者术中复位时间及总复位时间均较短[(3.40±1.05)min vs (6.09±0.84)min, P<0.001; (10.96±1.87)min vs (13.74±1.90)min, P<0.001]。双通道组患者手术时间较短[(53.62±8.99)min vs (68.35±5.29)min, P<0.001],术中出血量较少[(122.54±21.23)mL vs (146.43±31.02)mL, P<0.001],术后髋部疼痛评分较低(2.83±0.83 vs 3.30±1.09, P=0.008),术后超敏C反应蛋白水平较低[(19.33±5.87)mg/L vs (26.12±7.39)mg/L, P<0.001]。两组患者在切皮前闭合复位时间、内固定方式、骨折复位质量、骨折愈合时间及并发症方面均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论采用微创双通道技术治疗老年ⅠA型难复性股骨转子间骨折可缩短手术时间,减少术中出血,并且可以减轻术后局部炎症反应,减轻术后髋部疼痛,有利于患者术后快速康复。
关键词:  股骨转子间骨折  老年  双通道
DOI:10.12289/j.issn.1008-0392.22294
通信作者:
投稿时间:2022-07-21
录用日期:
基金项目:江苏省卫生健康委科研项目(Z2020006);江苏省卫生国际交流项目(JSH-2018-17);江苏省无锡市卫生健康委医学重点人才项目(ZRDC018);江苏省无锡市卫生健康委科研项目(M202172)
Dual-channel minimally invasive surgery for treatment of irreducible ⅠA intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients
JIANG Zhenhuan,SHEN Lei,WANG Qiang,JIANG Jianzhong,CHEN Jun,ZHANG Panjun
(Department of Orthopedics, Yixing People's Hospital, Yixing 214200, Jiangsu Province, China;Department of Geriatrics, Yixing People's Hospital, Yixing 214200, Jiangsu Province, China)
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluation the efficacy of dual-channel minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of irreducible ⅠA intertrochanteric fracture for elderly patients. MethodsClinical data of 52 elderly patients with irreducible ⅠA intertrochanteric fracture who received dual-channel minimally invasive surgery in our hospital from August 2016 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed; the clinical outcomes were compared with 82 patients who received three-channel treatment in the same period. The fracture reduction time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hip pain score, postoperative hypersensitive C-reactive protein(hs-CRP) level, fracture reduction quality, fracture healing time and related complications were compared between the two groups. ResultsThere was no significant difference in preoperative general data between the two groups(P>0.05). Compared with the three-channel group, the two-channel group had shorter intraoperative reduction time and total reduction time [(3.40±1.05)min vs (6.09±0.84)min, P<0.001; (10.96±1.87)min vs (13.74±1.90)min, P<0.001]; the dual-channel group had shorter operation time [(53.62±8.99)min vs (68.35±5.29)min, P<0.001] and less intraoperative blood loss [(122.54±21.23)mL vs (146.43±31.02)mL, P<0.001]. Postoperative hip pain score in dual-channel group was lower (2.83±0.83 vs 3.30±1.09, P=0.008), and postoperative hs-CRP level was lower [(19.33±5.87)mg/L vs (26.12±7.39)mg/L, P<0.001]. There were no significant differences in closed reduction time, implant options, fracture reduction quality, fracture healing time and complications between two groups(P>0.05). ConclusionThe minimally invasive dual-channel technique for the treatment of irreducible ⅠA intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly patients can shorten the operation time, reduce intraoperative bleeding, alleviate postoperative local inflammatory reaction, relieve postoperative hip pain, and benefit patients with rapid postoperative recovery.
Key words:  intertrochanteric fracture of femur  old age  dual channel

您是第6228434位访问者
网站版权 © 《同济大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
主管单位:教育部 主办单位:同济大学
地  址: 上海四平路1239号 邮编:200092 电话:021-65980705 E-mail: yxxb@tongji.edu.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计